Who gets credit for an opportunity, and what each kind of credit is allowed to decide. Marketing operations captures the touches; RevOps writes the rules and settles disputes.

GTM Operating Model › Revenue Operations › Attribution
Attribution: who gets credit, and for what
A touch is any recorded interaction between a person at a target account and the company. Sourced credit names the one channel that created the opportunity; influence credit is shared across every touch that helped it along.
Touch captured
campaign member, form fill, campaign-tagged (UTM) web visit, partner registration, product signup, outbound reply
Stamped on person and account
first and latest touch fields; never overwritten by Sales
Source decision
at the SQL gate: one sourced channel, locked on the opportunity
↗
Influence collected
every campaign, partner and product touch on the buying group, from the lookback window through close
Reported off the warehouse
one touchpoint table: a row per touch per opportunity
↗
SOURCED: ORDER OF PRECEDENCE, FIRST MATCH WINS
1 · Opportunity already open
on the account: no new source is set; the activity is logged as influence on that opportunity
2 · Partner sourced
a partner registered the deal before anyone at the company had touched the account
↗
3 · Product-led sourced
the account crossed the PQL threshold before it reached the gate
↗
4 · Outbound sourced
the meeting was booked from an outbound sequence an SDR or AE was running
↗
5 · Inbound sourced
otherwise, the first qualifying inbound touch inside the lookback window
↗
WHAT EACH ONE IS FOR
Sourced · one channel per opportunity
used for capacity planning, SDR and partner compensation, and the demand plan by source
Influenced · many touches per opportunity
used for marketing budget allocation; read as shares across a multi-touch model, which spreads credit over the touches by a set weighting; never used for comp
Self-reported · “how did you hear about us”
captured as its own field and compared with system attribution to find channels the tracking misses; never used to replace it
Rules: the source is locked at the gate and changed only by RevOps, with a logged reason. Sales cannot edit campaign or touch data. The lookback window (how far before the opportunity was created a touch still counts) and the multi-touch weighting are set in the quarterly definitions review. Marketing operations runs capture; RevOps owns the rules and arbitrates disputes. Companies differ on the precedence order, some ranking outbound above product-led; what matters is that it is written down and applied by the system, not argued deal by deal.
owner · Marketing operations (capture), RevOps (rules, arbitration) measured by · sourced and influenced pipeline by channel, share of opportunities with a source, disputes per quarter
checked in this order

Boxes marked ↗ open the page for that part of the model.

How to read this

  • Sourced and influenced answer different questions. Sourced says which motion created the deal, so it drives capacity, comp and the demand plan. Influenced says what helped, so it drives where marketing spends.
  • The sourced channel is decided once, at the SQL gate, by a fixed order checked by the system. Arguing it deal by deal is how attribution loses credibility.
  • An existing open opportunity always wins: new activity on an account already in a deal is influence, never a second source.
  • Self-reported source is kept beside system attribution, not instead of it. The gap between the two shows where tracking is blind, such as word of mouth, podcasts and communities.
  • The lookback window and the multi-touch weighting are definitions like any other: set and changed in the quarterly definitions review, not in a dashboard filter.

Where it connects

Diagram source: 18-attribution.drawio 18-attribution.svg