How accounts are divided among reps. Territories are carved on revenue potential, balanced within a tolerance, and assigned by rules that are written before anyone asks.

GTM Operating Model › Revenue Operations › Plan › Territories
Territories: carved on potential, assigned by rule
A territory is the set of accounts one rep owns. The carve is the rule that divides accounts among reps, and it differs by segment.
Account universe
every account that fits the ideal customer profile (ICP), enriched with company data
Score potential
firmographic fit, intent signals (research that suggests a buying cycle), current spend with us or a competitor
Segment
size bands from the annual plan; each band has its own motion
↗
Choose the carve
per segment: named, geographic, industry or pooled
Publish with the plan
loaded in the CRM with quotas before the year starts
Assign owners
keep existing relationships where possible; routing reads the result
↗
Balance
on potential, not account count, within a tolerance: the allowed gap between territories
owner · RevOps builds the carve; sales leaders review and sign their territories; changes mid-year only by written rule. measured by · potential per territory vs the tolerance, attainment spread by territory
CARVE BY SEGMENT
Enterprise
named accounts; small books, deep coverage
Mid-market
carved by geography or industry; larger books
SMB
pooled; round-robin inside the pool
↗
Product-led
no owner until an account crosses the sales-assist threshold
OVERLAYS · ROLES THAT SUPPORT TERRITORIES WITHOUT OWNING THE ACCOUNTS
Partner managers
by partner, not by account
Sales Engineers (SEs)
by segment or region
Sales-assist pool
works product-led accounts once they cross the threshold
CSM books
sized by ARR and complexity, not account count
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT · WHO OWNS WHAT WHEN IT IS NOT OBVIOUS
New contact, owned account
goes to the account owner, whatever the source
Parent and child accounts
roll up to the parent's owner
Account changes segment
changes owner only at a defined window, not the day it crosses
Rep leaves
book reassigned by rule; late-stage opportunities keep a named interim owner
Where companies vary: some carve mid-market by industry to build expertise, others by geography for time zones and travel. Either works if the territories are balanced on potential. Ownership stays at the account level, so a territory change moves accounts, and their open opportunities follow the rules above.

Boxes marked ↗ open the page for that part of the model.

How to read this

  • Balancing on account count gives one rep the five best accounts in the region and another the long tail. Potential is what a quota can fairly be set against.
  • The carve changes by segment because the selling changes. Enterprise needs depth on a few accounts; SMB needs speed across many.
  • Overlays such as SEs, partner managers and CSMs do not own accounts, so they are mapped to territories or partners rather than given books of their own.
  • Rules of engagement settle ownership arguments before they happen. Most territory disputes are about parent and child accounts, segment moves, or a rep leaving mid-deal.
  • Routing reads the territory assignment. A carve that is not loaded in the CRM does not exist as far as routing is concerned.

Where it connects

Diagram source: 21-territories.drawio 21-territories.svg